Chief retirement process comes under scrutiny, legality disputed
By Drake Baer
Posted: 2/19/07 Section: News
Last week Chief Illiniwek was retired by the Board of Trustees, but the legality of the process has been disputed.
Larry Eppley, the chairman of the Board of Trustees, may have called an "unplanned executive session" in order to process the decision. This is described in Article II, section 1 of the bylaws of the Board of Trustees. "Urgent business" may necessitate an unplanned session.
The Daily Illini was aware that a conference call between members of the board was scheduled for Feb. 15 and was rumored to put an end to the Chief. However, Trustee David Dorris and Student Trustee Sarah Doyle confirmed to the State Journal-Register that the call was canceled because of public disclosure guidelines outlined in the Open Meetings Act.
"I don't know anything about a conference call," Eppley said in an interview with the Daily Illini.
The executive committee is to meet for the transaction of any business "which is urgent and cannot be postponed to a regular meeting of the board."
It not officially known what constituted "urgent business" and could not wait until the next board meeting.
When asked about the legality, Dave Johnson, assistant dean of communications at the College of Law, said no one at the Law School would be able to comment on the issue because he felt the Board of Trustees did everything in the right way.
"Larry (Eppley) is a law grad, too," he added.
Also at issue are concerns regarding the Open Meetings Act.
"Policy decisions need to be a transparent, open process with public participation," said John Bambenek, owner of Part-Time Pundit, a local blog and former Illini Media Company employee.
Section 2.02 of the Open Meetings Act states that an agenda must be posted at least 48 hours before any sort of special meeting. Also, a public body, such as the board, is to post notice on its Web site.
The Open Meetings Act reads in section 1 that all public bodies exist to aid the business of the people, and thus their actions and deliberations must be conducted openly.
Larry Eppley, the chairman of the Board of Trustees, may have called an "unplanned executive session" in order to process the decision. This is described in Article II, section 1 of the bylaws of the Board of Trustees. "Urgent business" may necessitate an unplanned session.
The Daily Illini was aware that a conference call between members of the board was scheduled for Feb. 15 and was rumored to put an end to the Chief. However, Trustee David Dorris and Student Trustee Sarah Doyle confirmed to the State Journal-Register that the call was canceled because of public disclosure guidelines outlined in the Open Meetings Act.
"I don't know anything about a conference call," Eppley said in an interview with the Daily Illini.
The executive committee is to meet for the transaction of any business "which is urgent and cannot be postponed to a regular meeting of the board."
It not officially known what constituted "urgent business" and could not wait until the next board meeting.
When asked about the legality, Dave Johnson, assistant dean of communications at the College of Law, said no one at the Law School would be able to comment on the issue because he felt the Board of Trustees did everything in the right way.
"Larry (Eppley) is a law grad, too," he added.
Also at issue are concerns regarding the Open Meetings Act.
"Policy decisions need to be a transparent, open process with public participation," said John Bambenek, owner of Part-Time Pundit, a local blog and former Illini Media Company employee.
Section 2.02 of the Open Meetings Act states that an agenda must be posted at least 48 hours before any sort of special meeting. Also, a public body, such as the board, is to post notice on its Web site.
The Open Meetings Act reads in section 1 that all public bodies exist to aid the business of the people, and thus their actions and deliberations must be conducted openly.

Illini Media
WPGU
buzz
Illio
Technograph
The Daily Illini encourages on-topic discussion through article commenting on its articles and blogs. It is our policy not to delete any comments based upon political or ideological point of view. However, we reserve the right to remove comments that are abusive, off-topic or use excessive foul language.
The posting of copyrighted material, including any and all content for which you are not the author, is illegal under Federal intellectual property laws. Such activity will not be tolerated. Comments containing copyrighted material will be removed, and continued violation of copyright law is grounds for being banned completely from commenting on DailyIllini.com.
If you feel any post meets these conditions or merits review, please e-mail our editors at meonline@dailyillini.com.
Viewing Comments 1 - 1 of 1
John Bambenek
posted 2/19/07 @ 7:54 AM CST
The full version of my comments are online at http://www.parttimepundit.com
Post a Comment